The filed complaint alleges that defendants made false statements and/or concealed that: (1) Innodata did not have a viable AI technology; (2) its Goldengate AI platform, the centerpiece of Innodata’s reported AI technology, is a rudimentary software developed by just a handful of employees; (3) it was not going to utilize AI to any significant degree for new Silicon Valley contracts; (4) it was not effectively investing in research and development for AI; and (5) based on the foregoing, defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about Innodata’s AI business and development and related financial results, growth, and prospects.